Clinicians, researchers, and lab buyers increasingly ask ChatGPT, Claude, or Perplexity for options, evidence, and comparisons before they read a datasheet or a paper. The engines answer from the web, and for a medtech or life-science product an inaccurate or overstated answer is not a missed opportunity, it is a real problem. We make sure the assistants represent you accurately, credibly, and within the claims you are cleared to make, in coordination with your regulatory and MLR function. Across our work we get clients recommended at roughly an 80% success rate on the compliant, discoverable side.
We map the prompts your clinical and scientific audiences ask and run them across the engines, recording where the assistants are thin, wrong, or overstate, and which sources they trust, with the compliance boundary defined alongside your regulatory and MLR function.
We benchmark how the engines represent you against peers and incumbents and against the AEO patterns from the 60+ B2B tech companies we run, so we know which evidence-led content and signals will correct the picture fastest.
We prioritize by qualified-interest value: which evidence-based prompts to own, which cleared content to make citation-ready, which credible mentions to earn, and where SEO and scientific credibility should carry the rest, all inside the agreed boundary.
We execute on the compliant side: citation-ready evidence content, accurate entity and structured data, and the credibility-mention strategy, everything cleared through MLR, so the assistants represent you accurately and within your claims.
We monitor how the assistants represent you, tie AI-referred qualified interest to pipeline, and refine, correcting inaccuracies and expanding the evidence-based prompts you own, always within the boundary. AI Search becomes a managed, accountable, compliant channel.
We run AI Search across 60+ B2B tech companies and get them recommended at roughly an 80% success rate. We know how the engines assemble a picture of a company and which evidence-led content and third-party signals they retrieve, so we can correct a thin or overstated public picture efficiently, on the compliant side, in coordination with your regulatory function.
We run the prompts your clinical and scientific audiences would ask and record what the assistants currently say about you, where they are thin, wrong, or overstate a claim, and which sources they cite. Within weeks you have a clear, compliance-aware picture of the gap and a prioritized plan to correct it within your cleared claims.
AI Search is one surface clinicians and scientists use; evidence-led SEO, scientific credibility, and KOL presence are others. Running the full stack and respecting the compliance boundary, we sequence AEO against the rest of your GTM so it moves qualified clinical and scientific interest, not a vanity screenshot.
Your scientific, clinical, and regulatory teams know the real questions and what is cleared to say. We turn that into the exact prompts we target and the evidence-anchored, MLR-cleared content that answers them, so the assistants represent you accurately where your buyers research and never beyond your claims.
We instrument the discoverable side end to end, presence and accuracy for your target prompts, AI-referred sessions, and the qualified clinical, scientific, and institutional interest they produce, in your CRM. That makes AI-search work an accountable contributor over a long, evidence-gated cycle, not an untracked exercise.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
Our founder led their marketing as Head of Marketing, running a 7-person team across SEO, demand gen, and paid — $1M/year in marketing revenue. Re-engaged in 2026 and halved cost per MQL and SQL.
ServicesFractional CMO · SEO · Demand Generation · Paid Ads
Senior operators on every account. Never a junior pod.
Rebuilt inbound from scratch — 100% YoY SQL growth, 207% more traffic, domain rating from 12 to 45, and 141 articles shipped.
ServicesFractional CMO · SEO · Demand Generation
“We've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and our domain rating improved from 12 to 45.”
Took a referral-only firm to a real new-business engine — 5 deals and $240K revenue from Meta in a year, plus 2–4 SQLs/month from ChatGPT.
ServicesMeta Ads · Fractional CMO · AI Search
“Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.”
Positioned them as the recommended Salesforce partner inside the major LLMs — two $1M enterprise deals closed from ChatGPT in a 3-month engagement.
ServicesAI Search · Fractional CMO · Meta Ads
“They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.”
Built the marketing function from zero — website, SEO, paid, AI search — from 166 to 2,513 monthly clicks and 3 enterprise deals won.
ServicesFractional CMO · SEO · AI Search · Meta Ads
“They defined a clear marketing strategy and established our unique value proposition.”
Turned Salesforce-niche SEO into a deal channel — 2.73× traffic and MQL-to-SQL conversion up from 17% to 29%.
ServicesSEO · Content Marketing
“We have started receiving our first inbound requests.”
Restructured the marketing team and shifted to lead-driving SEO — doubling client count and growing SQLs 133% in nine months.
ServicesSEO · Fractional CMO
Switched them from brand-awareness content to lead-driving SEO — 20 of 25 service pages ranked top 5 and the first deals closed from organic.
ServicesSEO · Fractional CMO · Content Marketing
“XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.”
Stood up SEO as a new acquisition channel — domain rating 27 to 44, 50+ leads, and 88 articles in nine months.
ServicesSEO
“Their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.”
After six months of zero results from another agency, we delivered +70% Google clicks and grew AI-assistant traffic from 10 to 154/month in three months — and the first SQLs from SEO.
ServicesSEO · AI Search
Meta appointment funnels at scale — 466 leads and over 100 booked sales conversations from a single paid channel.
ServicesAppointment Funnels · Meta Ads
“They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative.”
Set up marketing from zero — positioning, website, LinkedIn social selling, and an ABM campaign that landed four new clients fast.
ServicesFractional CMO · ABM · LinkedIn
“Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.”
Positioned a small studio in a niche AI-search category — recommended by LLMs for 2 commercial keywords, landing a big client in one month.
ServicesAI Search · AEO/GEO · Website
“They knew how to approach AI search practically, not just in theory.”
Recommended by every major AI assistant for 3 commercial keywords, plus a deal closed from Meta appointment funnels.
ServicesAI Search · Appointment Funnels
“What impressed us most was their deep specialization with software development companies.”
Positioned for an important commercial keyword and recommended by the major AI assistants within a single month.
ServicesAI Search · AEO/GEO
Took over marketing as their agency after an unsuccessful in-house run — GTM strategy, paid funnels, AI search, and LinkedIn delivered 75 leads and the first qualified pipeline.
ServicesFractional CMO · GTM Strategy · Appointment Funnels · AI Search
A targeted ABM campaign booked 13 conversations with ICP accounts and opened three opportunities in two months.
ServicesABM
Repositioned the agency, revamped the site, and built appointment funnels that booked qualified intro calls at just $34 each.
ServicesAppointment Funnels · Positioning · Website
A custom AI-assistant paid funnel produced 76 leads and 34 booked appointments at $123 per call with an ICP.
ServicesAppointment Funnels · Meta Ads
Meta appointment funnels delivered 35 leads at a $42 CPL and closed two deals on modest spend.
ServicesAppointment Funnels · Meta Ads
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
Yes, when it is done compliance-first and in coordination with your regulatory and MLR function, which is how we work. We anchor everything to your cleared claims, never chase a recommendation by overstating, and treat accuracy as the goal. AEO here is largely about making sure your accurate, evidence-anchored story is what the assistants find and cite, and about catching and correcting inaccurate or overstated answers about you, which is itself a compliance protection. Done this way it reduces risk rather than creating it.
Yes, and in a medical context that is one of the most important things we do, because an inaccurate or overstated AI answer about your product is a real problem, not just a missed opportunity. When the public web is thin or loud, the models fill the gap incorrectly. We make your accurate, cleared, evidence-anchored story exist on the open web in a form the engines can lift correctly, seed the credible mentions that corroborate it, and monitor for inaccuracies, all in coordination with your regulatory function, so the assistants stop overstating and start representing you correctly.
By working compliance-first and with your MLR function. Every claim we surface is anchored to your clearances and evidence, we do not overstate efficacy or imply off-label use, and content is built to move through MLR review. We treat a claim as the regulated act it is. In a field where a careless claim, even one an AI repeats from your content, is a legal and regulatory risk, that disciplined process is the foundation, and it is what separates us from a generic agency chasing recommendations without knowing the constraint exists.
No, though they share a foundation. SEO ranks your pages; AEO gets you accurately represented and cited inside the generated answer, and here it depends on getting cleared, evidence-anchored substance onto the open web plus the scientific and clinical mentions the engines corroborate, rather than trusting your site alone. An agency that only rewrites pages gets you cited occasionally but never accurately shortlisted, and risks overstatement. We run both the on-site citation work and the off-site credibility work, compliance-first.
We track whether the assistants represent you accurately and cite you for your evidence-based prompts (monitored over time), AI-referred sessions, and the qualified clinical, scientific, and institutional interest they produce in your CRM. Attribution is long and multi-stakeholder, so we watch leading indicators and connect them to pipeline through the evidence-gated cycle. The goal is accurate representation and qualified, traceable interest, not a recommendation count, and certainly not one earned by overstating.
Because this field punishes a generalist's blind spots dangerously. A general AEO shop chases recommendations at any cost, ignores MLR, and risks surfacing or amplifying an inaccurate or off-label claim. We work compliance-first with your regulatory function, correct and expand your accurate public picture within cleared claims, target the evidence-based prompts where your validated value is real, and tie qualified interest to pipeline. You get AEO run by people who respect the evidence bar and the regulatory line and build within them.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.
I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
