
DBB Software
Built the marketing function from zero — website, SEO, paid, AI search — from 166 to 2,513 monthly clicks and 3 enterprise deals won.
- 28 SQLs from zero
- 3 deals won
Your buyer is not casually shopping — they are about to bet a multi-year budget and their own credibility on whoever will not blow up their go-live, and right now they are finding you through the vendor's partner directory next to forty other certified firms. We have marketed for 60+ B2B tech companies, including services and implementation partners in enterprise-software ecosystems, and we build the demand engine that moves you off the partner-tier badge and into the shortlist as the firm that de-risks the implementation in their industry — with every result tracked back to CRM revenue.
A large share of your pipeline starts inside the software vendor's world — the SAP, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics, Oracle, or Odoo partner directory, a partner-tier badge, a co-sell or lead-share program — and the buyer often meets you as one of many "certified" firms in a filtered list. That dependency feels like distribution but it is also a cap: you compete on tier and certification count on someone else's page, your ranking is the vendor's algorithm, and the relationship can change with a program redesign. The hard part is building demand you actually own, so the directory becomes one channel among several instead of the ceiling on your growth.
Gold/elite partner status, a wall of consultant certifications, and "X successful implementations" are table stakes that every competitor in the ecosystem also has — so leading with them makes you interchangeable. The buyer cannot tell a firm with five hundred certifications apart from one with three hundred; both look like a safe, generic choice and the conversation collapses to rate and availability. The work is to shift the evaluation from "are they certified" (everyone is) to "have they delivered this exact implementation, in my industry, at my scale, without it failing" — the only frame where an ERP firm wins on something other than price and badge count.
Buyers have read the horror stories — ERP programs that ran years over, blew past budget, disrupted operations at cutover, or got abandoned mid-stream. So underneath every polite capability question is one fear: will this firm be the reason our implementation becomes one of those stories. That fear, not feature fit, drives the decision, and marketing that lists modules and methodologies speaks past it. The job is to make delivery risk visibly lower with you — proof of on-time, on-budget go-lives, change-management depth, and what happens when something goes wrong — long before the first call.
An ERP decision is too expensive to make on a pitch, so the buyer leans on references, peer signals, analyst and review-site presence, and case evidence from companies that look like them. They will call your references, read the reviews, and discount anything generic. Yet most consulting-firm sites offer a logo wall and a paragraph of testimonials instead of the outcome-led, industry-specific, named proof the evaluation actually runs on. The credibility gap is widest exactly where it decides the deal — and the firm that publishes real, specific proof beats the one asking buyers to take capability on faith.
A serious ERP selection is run by a committee with opposed anxieties: the CFO and CIO worry about total cost and a failed transformation, operations worries about disruption to how the business actually runs, end users worry about being forced into a worse day-to-day, and procurement is mandated to standardize the choice and grind the price. Marketing that speaks only to the technical evaluator never reaches the people who can fund or veto you. You have to be credible to finance, to operations, and to procurement as well as to IT — or the deal stalls in a stakeholder you were never positioned for.
ERP firms typically grow on the vendor channel, referrals, and a few anchor accounts — and when they finally invest in marketing, a 9–18 month, multi-stakeholder, board-approved cycle makes the impact almost impossible to see. The first touch happened many anonymous research sessions before anyone booked a call, so marketing gets blamed for "not generating leads" and cut at the worst possible moment. Without CRM attribution across that long, committee-driven path, the channel quietly building next year's pipeline reads as a cost center instead of the engine it is.
We have spent 9+ years marketing to technical and executive buyers across 60+ B2B tech companies — including services and implementation partners that sell inside enterprise-software ecosystems — so we do not open an engagement by learning the category. We start with a point of view on the question your buyer is really asking: not "which certified partner," but "who makes it least likely that this multi-year, business-critical implementation fails — in our industry, at our scale." That reframe is the difference between competing on partner tier and competing on de-risked delivery. Across this work we have generated $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue, so every recommendation below is shaped by what we have watched convert to signed statements of work — not by what is fashionable.
This is the default stack for an ERP consulting firm that wants tracked, compounding pipeline it owns — instead of depending on the vendor directory and a pile of disconnected tactics. We rarely run all of it at once. A go-to-market lead sequences it against your ecosystem, your industry focus, your deal size, and where the next dollar pays back — and every layer reports into one CRM-attributed view of revenue, because in this category the deal is won or lost across finance, operations, procurement, and a board long after the first click.
We start by auditing what is already working — including how much of your pipeline the vendor channel actually owns — then fix positioning so you stop competing as one more certified directory listing and start being the obvious firm to de-risk a specific industry's implementation. We map the full buying group (CIO, CFO, operations, end users, procurement), choose the channel mix that fits your deal size and ecosystem, and stand up CRM attribution. You get senior go-to-market leadership accountable to pipeline, not just a campaign calendar.
We target the selection-stage, vertical-fit, and platform-comparison queries your buyers actually search — "how to choose a [platform] implementation partner," "[platform] vs. [platform] for [industry]," "why ERP implementations fail," "ERP implementation cost" — with Jobs-to-Be-Done content and a case-study and service-page architecture engineered to rank and convert. This is the durable, compounding core of the system, and the place ERP firms most often cede ground to the software vendor and the directories.
We build the evidence the rest of the system points to: outcome-led, named case studies organized by industry and platform, reference-grade delivery detail (timeline, change management, what went wrong and how you handled it), and a credible presence on the review and analyst surfaces buyers check before they shortlist. In a market that buys on reference and fear of failure, these credibility assets convert better than any campaign because they remove the first reason to disqualify you.
We make sure that when a buyer asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google's AI overview to recommend an implementation partner for their platform and industry, your name comes up — and reflects defensible, delivery-backed positioning, not hype the model cannot substantiate. We optimize for buyer prompts and the assets these engines cite, capturing demand at the new top of the funnel before the vendor directories and review aggregators adapt.
Traffic and attention are worthless until they become qualified conversations with buyers who can actually sponsor an ERP program through finance and procurement. We build the landing pages, offers — implementation readiness assessments, total-cost and risk diagnostics — and paid funnels that turn interest into booked, sales-ready meetings, with tracking that ties every click to a meeting, an SQL, and a signed SOW so spend stays accountable while the organic engine matures.
In a high-trust, reference-driven market, buyers trust senior practitioners over firm logos. A credible founder or delivery lead with a real point of view on how to run an ERP program without it failing earns trust a faceless partner brand cannot — so we make them the front door, then route the demand they create into the same funnel and CRM as everything else, instead of leaving it locked in one person's network or the vendor's lead-share queue.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
The same standard applies to every market we work in: we measure marketing by qualified demand, accepted sales conversations, and revenue traced back to marketing inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
Not by advertising your partner tier and certification count — every competitor in the ecosystem has those, so it just makes you interchangeable. We start by repositioning you off the directory listing so you win as the firm that de-risks a specific industry's implementation rather than as one more certified partner, then build a system around selection-stage SEO (how to choose a partner, platform-vs-platform for an industry, why implementations fail), a proof-and-reference layer that answers the buyer's fear of a failed go-live, AI-search visibility, appointment funnels, and founder-led LinkedIn. Everything routes into one CRM-attributed view of pipeline, and we track deals through the finance, procurement, and board-approval stages ERP deals actually stall in. For most of the 60+ B2B tech companies we have worked with, the unlock is leading with delivered outcomes and risk removed, not capabilities and badges.
Because that channel is real distribution and a real ceiling at the same time. Inside the vendor's directory you compete on tier and certification count, you appear next to dozens of "certified" firms in a list the vendor controls, your ranking is their algorithm, and a single partner-program redesign or lead-share change can move your pipeline overnight. Firms that depend on it grow until the channel plateaus and have no demand engine of their own when it does. We don't ask you to abandon the directory — it stays a valuable channel — but we build owned demand alongside it (selection-stage SEO, AI-search presence, a proof layer, founder-led content) so the directory becomes one source among several instead of the cap on your growth. That is how you stop being one filtered listing and start being the firm a buyer already wanted before they opened the directory.
By changing what the buyer is evaluating. Tier and certification count are table stakes — the buyer genuinely cannot tell a firm with five hundred certifications apart from one with three hundred, and leading with them makes you a safe, generic, interchangeable choice that competes on rate and availability. We reposition you around a specific industry, module, migration, or company size you are demonstrably best at — manufacturing NetSuite, multi-entity finance on Dynamics, an S/4HANA migration for a particular vertical — and build the named, outcome-led proof that you have delivered exactly that without it failing. That is the only frame where an ERP firm wins on something other than price and badge count, and it is the first thing we fix, because no amount of traffic helps while the buyer can't tell you apart from the partner above you on tier.
Head-on, with proof, because that fear — not feature fit — is what actually drives the decision. Every buyer has heard about ERP programs that ran years over budget, disrupted operations at cutover, or got abandoned mid-stream, so underneath every capability question is one worry: will this firm be the reason our implementation becomes one of those stories. Marketing that lists modules and methodologies speaks right past it. We build the proof layer that makes delivery risk visibly lower with you: named, industry-specific case studies that lead with on-time, on-budget go-lives and the disruption you avoided; reference-grade detail on timeline, change management, and how you handled things going wrong; and presence on the review and analyst surfaces buyers check. In a market that buys on fear of failure, the firm that proves a safe go-live converts the one that asks buyers to take it on faith.
It has to, because each of them can fund or veto you and they fear different things. The CFO and CIO worry about total cost and a failed transformation; operations worries about disruption to how the business actually runs; end users worry about a worse day-to-day; and procurement is mandated to standardize the decision and grind the price. Marketing that speaks only to the technical evaluator never reaches the people who hold the budget. We build positioning and proof aimed at each stakeholder — total-cost and ROI material for finance, risk and continuity for the CIO, adoption and change-management proof for operations, references and security posture for procurement — and we arm your champion with what they need to defend you internally. Then we track deals through those exact stakeholder and approval stages in your CRM so you can see where they stall and fix it, which is also what keeps marketing funded through a long committee cycle instead of blamed for it.
By being clear about where you add value the vendor's own sales motion cannot, and marketing to that. The platform vendor wants licenses sold and will route some opportunities to whichever partner is convenient; you win when the buyer specifically wants a firm that de-risks delivery in their industry, owns the change management, and is accountable for the go-live — not just a reseller of seats. We position you on that delivery and outcome value rather than on the platform itself, so you are not competing with the vendor on product messaging and you are not interchangeable with every other reseller in the program. Done well, that makes you the partner the vendor's own reps want to bring into deals, and the firm buyers ask for by name — which strengthens the co-sell relationship instead of straining it.
You will not beat SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, or the partner-directory sites head-on for a term like 'ERP software,' and you should not try. We target the selection-stage, vertical-fit, and platform-comparison queries they under-serve — 'how to choose a [platform] implementation partner,' '[platform] vs. [platform] for [industry],' 'why ERP implementations fail,' 'ERP implementation cost for [industry]' — plus the AI-answer surfaces the directories haven't figured out. Those are the searches a buyer runs while actively selecting a firm, and they convert to real opportunities rather than education traffic. That depth-and-intent approach is how Synebo reached #1 on Google in its ecosystem with no link-building, and how we consistently turn modest authority into compounding, buyer-intent traffic that books qualified meetings.
Your buyers now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google's AI overviews to recommend an implementation partner — 'best NetSuite partners for manufacturing,' 'top SAP S/4HANA consulting firms for [industry]' — before they ever open the vendor directory or a firm's site, and the answer often skips the directories and search results entirely. If your name isn't in that recommendation, you are invisible at the new top of the funnel, even with an elite partner tier. We optimize for those buyer prompts and the assets these engines cite, anchored to defensible, delivery-backed positioning, and we currently get clients recommended in AI search at an 80% success rate — a gap the vendor directories and review aggregators have not closed.
That mix is great until the channel plateaus or an anchor account winds down — and it leaves you with no demand engine you actually control. We usually start with a go-to-market engagement to audit what's working (including how dependent you really are on the vendor's leads), reposition you off the partner tier, and stand up CRM attribution, then layer in the channels that pay back fastest for your ecosystem and deal size. DBB Software came to us building marketing from a standing start and we took it to 28 SQLs and 3 won deals in a year; WeSoftYou had effectively zero inbound and we rebuilt it into $1.8M of tracked pipeline. The path is to keep the referral and channel engines running while we build owned, compounding demand alongside them.
Appointment funnels and paid can book qualified meetings within weeks; SEO and AI search around partner-selection and vertical-fit themes typically show traction in 4–6 months and compound pipeline impact over 9–18 — and ERP's board-approved, committee-driven cycle means deals close later than in most B2B tech. Either way we report against your CRM — pipeline created, SQLs, and closed-won attributed to channel and tracked through procurement, security, and board approval — not traffic for its own sake. That discipline is how our portfolio reached $30M+ in CRM-tracked marketing-led revenue, 2.4x organic traffic in 9 months, and 133% SQL growth per quarter.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.