
Synebo
Turned Salesforce-niche SEO into a deal channel — 2.73× traffic and MQL-to-SQL conversion up from 17% to 29%.
- 2.73× organic traffic
- MQL→SQL 17% → 29%
When a CTO or VP of Engineering asks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, or Google's AI Overviews "who are the best custom software development companies for [their stack, their domain, their problem]," three to five firms get named — and the rest of the market never makes the shortlist. We get your dev shop into that answer for the prompts that precede a real build, and we tie the recommendation back to booked meetings and CRM-tracked revenue. Across our work we hit an 80% recommendation success rate on targeted commercial prompts.
We define and prioritize the build-intent prompts that decide deals in your verticals and engagement models, then baseline where you stand on each across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Overviews. You get an honest map of which recommendations you win, which you lose, and where a model has you filed as a generic outsourcing vendor instead of the specialist you are.
We line your visibility up against the citation and recommendation patterns we've seen across 60+ custom software, outsourcing, and product firms. That tells us fast whether the gap is missing named-client proof, a thin Clutch/G2 footprint, weak entity data, or the wrong domain association — so we diagnose the cause in this specific category instead of guessing at tactics.
We pick the smallest set of moves that will actually change answers for your prompts: earning placement on the directories and listicles models cite for dev shops, fixing entity data so you're tied to a domain, or publishing the comparison and proof content that becomes a citable source. No fluff retainer — only the levers that shift recommendations toward booked builds.
We execute the chosen path as a repeatable program: directory and review-signal work, entity and schema cleanup that fixes your category framing, outcome-led case studies reworked as citable proof, and answer-shaping comparison content — sequenced so each piece reinforces the others. AI Search becomes a compounding asset for your dev shop, not a one-off experiment.
Every cycle we re-measure the prompt set, attribute AI-sourced leads through your long sales cycle in the CRM, and pull your sales team's read on which scoping calls were real builds versus tire-kickers. Prompts that produce qualified pipeline get more investment; the ones that pull students and rate-shoppers get cut. The system tunes toward tracked SQLs and won projects, month over month.
We've marketed for 60+ custom software, IT outsourcing, and product-development firms over nine years, so we already know the commercial prompts that precede a build — and how they fork by domain, engagement model, and stack. "Custom software development company" pulls students and competitors; "who to hire for a HIPAA-compliant healthtech build" pulls a buyer with budget. We start from the prompt set we've watched convert into pipeline for dev shops, not a discovery deck that learns your category on your budget.
Most dev shops can't say whether a model names them, ignores them, or — the common case — files them under the wrong category entirely (a fintech specialist getting surfaced as a generic outsourcing vendor). We baseline your presence across the commercial prompts that matter in your verticals on day one: who's named, who's cited, and where the model has mis-framed you. Within weeks you know exactly which build conversations you're absent from and why, instead of running blind experiments.
For a dev shop, the lever that moves an AI answer is rarely your own site — it's the signal a model already trusts: named-client case studies it can parse, your G2 and Clutch presence, the comparison and "best [category] for [vertical]" pages it quotes, and clean entity data that ties your firm to a specific domain. We fund only the moves that shift recommendations for your category, not a fixed content checklist that ignores how this market actually gets cited.
An AI recommendation is worthless if it sends tire-kickers — students, founders fishing for free advice, or buyers shopping purely on rate. We sit close to your sales team, review which AI-sourced leads booked real scoping calls, and learn which prompts and framings produce qualified build conversations versus noise. That feedback retargets the prompt set monthly toward the domains and engagement models your team actually closes.
We treat AI Search as a measurable channel for a long, multi-stakeholder deal. Beyond a visibility report, we instrument how an AI-discovered prospect enters your CRM and tie prompt-set movement to booked meetings, SQLs, and won projects across a six-to-nine-month cycle. You see the line from "now recommended for fintech builds" to "deal in pipeline" — the same CRM discipline behind the $30M+ in marketing-led revenue we've tracked for clients in this space.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
Not from how polished your own website is. A model builds its answer from how often and how credibly your firm is discussed across sources it trusts — named-client outcomes, Clutch and G2 reviews, "top software development companies" listicles, expert mentions — plus how cleanly it can categorize you. In a market where every dev shop's site says the same thing, that external signal and clear domain specialization are what get you named. We work on the prompts, the citation sources, and the entity data together, because tweaking your site alone almost never moves the recommendation.
Yes — that's exactly the problem, and it's worse with a model than with a human. Faced with ten interchangeable "end-to-end partners," a model defaults to the firms with the strongest, most specific signal: named-client results it can parse, a real review footprint, and clear domain ties it can match to the buyer's prompt. The fix isn't louder marketing; it's making your firm legibly the specialist for something — a vertical, a stack, an engagement model — so the model has a reason to surface you when a buyer asks about that specific build.
Generic AI Search chases broad "best vendor" prompts. For a dev shop we go narrower and more commercial, because that's where real builds start: "best custom software development company for fintech," "who should we hire to migrate a legacy monolith," "top Salesforce consultancies," "dedicated development team vs project shop," and "[competitor] alternatives." These pull buyers mid-evaluation with budget and a live initiative, and they fork sharply by domain and engagement model — which is exactly the prompt structure we've watched convert to pipeline across 60+ software companies.
It hurts both. A case study that leads with the stack, the sprints, and the architecture diagram impresses engineers but gives a model little it can use to recommend you for a business problem — and it doesn't speak to the economic buyer who signs the contract. We rebuild your proof as outcome-led, domain-specific case studies that lead with the business result and the risk removed, structured so a model can cite them as evidence you've shipped in a buyer's vertical. That same rework makes your SEO and human conversion harder too — it's one of the highest-leverage moves in this category.
We baseline your presence across a defined build-intent prompt set — who's named, who's cited, how you're framed by domain — then track movement on that set over time. The part most agencies skip: we instrument how AI-discovered prospects enter your CRM and follow them through a long, multi-stakeholder deal — first touch, scoping call, SQL, won project. You see the line from "now recommended for healthtech builds" to "deal closed," the same CRM discipline behind the $30M+ in marketing-led revenue we've tracked for clients.
It's more winnable, which is why it matters now. You won't beat firms with a decade of domain authority and seven-figure budgets on "custom software development" head-on — but AI recommendations don't work on raw domain authority alone. A model weighs specific, credible signal: named-client proof in a vertical, a strong review footprint, clean entity data, and content it can cite. A focused dev shop can earn those on a narrow domain faster than it can outrank a giant on a head term, and a few credible new signals can change an answer. The big content farms haven't closed this gap — that's the opening.
That risk is real in this category — "custom software development" attracts students, competitors, and founders fishing for free advice — which is exactly why we anchor the program to narrow build-intent prompts and your sales team's feedback, not raw mention counts. "Who should we hire to build [specific thing]" and "alternatives to [competitor]" surface buyers mid-evaluation, so the leads arrive further along. We review which AI-sourced conversations your team qualifies, then weight the prompt set toward the domains and engagement models that produce real scoping calls and cut the ones that don't.
Yes — they reinforce each other, especially here. The long-tail, use-case, and vertical content that ranks you in organic search is also signal a model reads when it builds recommendations, and AI Overviews sit directly on top of search results. We don't position AI Search as a replacement for SEO; it's the layer that captures the buyers who now start in an assistant and would otherwise never reach your site. Most software companies run both as one system, which is why this page links to our B2B SEO service alongside the core AI Search Optimization offering.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.