
Synebo
Turned Salesforce-niche SEO into a deal channel — 2.73× traffic and MQL-to-SQL conversion up from 17% to 29%.
- 2.73× organic traffic
- MQL→SQL 17% → 29%
Your buyers are not evaluating CRM software — they already chose Salesforce, HubSpot, or Dynamics. They are deciding which certified partner they trust to implement it without breaking their data, their pipeline, and their team's adoption. We have marketed for 60+ B2B tech companies, including Salesforce consultancies, and we build the demand engine that lifts you out of the certified-partner sea of sameness into the shortlist — with every result tracked back to CRM revenue, not badges and traffic.
Salesforce alone has thousands of consulting partners, and HubSpot, Dynamics, and NetSuite each have their own crowded partner tiers. Every one of them leads with the same proof: certifications, partner tier, years on the platform, number of consultants. To a buyer, that is noise — a wall of identical Crest, Summit, Diamond, and Elite badges that signals table-stakes, not differentiation. The hard part is that the credentials you worked hardest for are precisely the ones that make you interchangeable, so winning means owning a specific industry, product cloud, or implementation risk you are demonstrably best at, not stacking more logos in a row.
Unlike most B2B tech firms, a CRM consultancy lives inside someone else's ecosystem. Salesforce and HubSpot generate the buyer's intent, run the AppExchange and Solutions Directory, and route referrals through their own AEs and partner managers. That is real pipeline, but it is rented: the platform decides who gets the lead, co-sells on its terms, and can deprioritize you overnight. Firms that grow only on platform-sourced and referral leads have no demand they control — and discover it the quarter the partner manager changes or the co-sell motion cools.
CRM projects are notorious for going sideways: botched data migrations, integrations that never sync, customizations that calcify into technical debt, and the quiet killer — low user adoption that makes the whole investment look wasted. The buyer has either lived through one of these or heard the horror stories, so under every evaluation is a single anxious question: will this firm break my revenue operations? Most consultancy sites answer with feature lists and cloud logos instead of evidence that they de-risk migration, drive adoption, and own the outcome — which leaves the buyer's biggest objection completely unaddressed.
The platform directories — AppExchange, the HubSpot Solutions Directory, Microsoft's partner finder — are where a large share of buyers actually shortlist, and they flatten every firm into a star rating, a review count, and a list of expertise tags. That listing ranks in search, gets cited by AI assistants, and often outranks your own website for your own category. So you are not only competing with other partners; you are competing with a commoditized version of yourself that the platform controls. Marketing that ignores the listing surface cedes the exact place the decision narrows.
Many CRM consultancies live deal-to-deal on large implementation projects, then scramble when the pipeline gaps between them — while the durable, high-margin revenue sits in the managed-services, optimization, and AppExchange-product motions they under-market. The two need very different marketing: implementation buyers are choosing a one-time partner under risk, retainer and product buyers are choosing an ongoing relationship. Run them as one undifferentiated funnel and you optimize for the lumpy project work and starve the recurring revenue that actually compounds enterprise value.
On anything beyond a small implementation, marketing has to convince more than the RevOps or sales-ops leader who feels the pain. There is an economic buyer weighing the project against in-house build or a rival SI, a security and procurement function vetting data handling and the MSA, and frequently the platform's own account executive influencing which partner gets recommended. Speak only to the practitioner and the deal stalls in a review your AEs were never in; ignore the platform relationship and you lose the warm introduction that would have shortlisted you in the first place.
We have spent 9+ years marketing to technical and executive buyers across 60+ B2B tech companies — including Salesforce consulting partners — so we do not open an engagement by learning the ecosystem. We know the buyer has already picked the platform and is now choosing whom to trust with their revenue operations, that the platform both feeds and threatens your pipeline, and that "certified Diamond partner" persuades no one because every competitor says it too. We start from a point of view on which buyer, vertical, and implementation risk you should own — and then wire every activity back to CRM revenue. That discipline is how we took Synebo, a Salesforce consultancy, to 500% more SQLs and 2.73x organic traffic, ranking #1 on Google with no link-building, and it is part of how our portfolio reached $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue.
This is the default stack for a CRM consultancy that wants tracked, compounding pipeline it owns — not just leads the platform decides to hand over. We rarely run all of it at once; we sequence it against your stage, your average implementation value, and the split between project work and recurring managed services. Every layer reports into one CRM-attributed view of revenue, because in this category the deal is influenced across the platform relationship, procurement, and a long evaluation your AEs are not always in the room for.
Before spend, we fix what you are the obvious choice for: a vertical, a product cloud, or an implementation risk you are demonstrably best at — so you stop competing as one more identical Diamond or Elite badge. We map the full buying group (RevOps practitioner, economic buyer, security/procurement, and the platform AE who influences the referral) and write positioning that lets each self-identify. Everything downstream inherits this; without it, more traffic just means more buyers who can't tell you apart from the partner above you in the directory.
We target the platform-, industry-, and risk-specific queries your buyers actually search — "Salesforce vs. HubSpot for [industry]," "how to migrate CRM data without losing pipeline," "why CRM adoption fails," "in-house vs. implementation partner" — with Jobs-to-Be-Done content and a case-study and service-page architecture engineered to rank and convert. This is the durable, compounding core of the system and the demand you own outright, independent of the partner channel. It is where consultancies most often leave money on the table, and it is where Synebo reached #1 on Google with no link-building.
We build the proof the rest of the system points to: outcome-led case studies aimed at the economic buyer that lead with the result and the risk you removed (zero-downtime migration, adoption lifted from 30% to 90%, the integration they were worried about, made to work), in their industry and on their product cloud. Plus the answers most partners avoid — how you protect data in migration, how you guarantee adoption, who owns the outcome. In a market built on the fear of a botched project, these credibility assets convert better than any campaign because they remove the first reason to disqualify you.
We make sure that when a buyer asks ChatGPT, Perplexity, or Google's AI overview to recommend a Salesforce, HubSpot, or Dynamics implementation partner for their industry, your name comes up — anchored to a defensible positioning, not hype the model cannot substantiate. We optimize for buyer prompts and the assets these engines cite, capturing demand at the new top of the funnel that increasingly skips both the platform directory and traditional search. Across our work this drives roughly an 80% AI Search recommendation success rate.
Attention and directory views are worthless until they become qualified conversations with buyers who can actually sponsor an implementation through procurement. We build the landing pages, offers, and paid funnels that turn interest into booked, sales-ready meetings — useful exactly when you need pipeline now, are launching a new product cloud or vertical practice, or are smoothing the gaps between large projects — with tracking that ties every click to a meeting, an SQL, and a deal so spend stays accountable while the organic engine matures.
Finally, we stand up the owned demand channels — founder- and expert-led LinkedIn, account-based campaigns against your ICP, and content distribution — so your pipeline no longer depends entirely on the platform's routing and your referral network. A credible delivery leader with a real point of view on doing CRM implementation well earns trust a faceless certified-partner brand cannot, and we route the demand they create into the same funnel and CRM as everything else. The platform relationship becomes one channel in a system you control, instead of the whole system.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
The same standard applies to every market we work in: we measure marketing by qualified demand, accepted sales conversations, and revenue traced back to marketing inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
Not by listing certifications and partner tiers — every competitor holds the same badges, so to a buyer that is noise. We start by repositioning you around a specific vertical, product cloud, or implementation risk you are demonstrably best at, then build a system around decision-stage SEO (platform comparisons, migration, adoption, build-vs-buy), a trust layer that answers the fear of a failed implementation, AI-search visibility, appointment funnels, and founder-led demand. Everything routes into one CRM-attributed view of pipeline. The key shift for most of the 60+ B2B tech companies we have worked with is to stop renting all your demand from the platform and start building channels you own — which is how we took the Salesforce consultancy Synebo to 500% more SQLs and #1 on Google with no link-building.
Because platform- and directory-sourced leads are real revenue, but they are rented, not owned. The platform decides who gets the referral, co-sells on its terms, controls the AppExchange or Solutions Directory ranking, and can deprioritize you overnight when a partner manager changes or the co-sell motion cools. Firms that grow only on that channel have no demand they control and feel it the quarter routing shifts. We keep your platform relationship running as one channel while we build the owned, compounding ones — SEO, AI Search, founder-led demand — so a routing change no longer empties your pipeline, and so you can pursue the deals the platform never hands you.
By accepting that your hardest-won credentials are exactly what make you interchangeable, then competing on something else. Buyers read a wall of Diamond, Crest, Summit, and Elite badges as table stakes, not differentiation. We reposition you around a specific buyer, vertical, or product cloud (Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, CPQ, Marketing Cloud) and an implementation risk you own — and back it with outcome-led proof rather than logo rows. That is the only frame where a CRM consultancy wins on something other than being one more certified partner, and it is the first thing we fix, because no amount of traffic helps while the buyer literally cannot tell you apart from the firm ranked above you in the directory.
Head-on, with evidence — because the fear of a failed migration, a broken integration, or a system nobody adopts is the real objection under every CRM deal, and most partner sites never speak to it. We build a trust-and-evidence layer that answers it in public: outcome-led case studies that lead with the implementation risk you removed (migrated the data with zero downtime, lifted adoption from 30% to 90%, made the integration they were worried about actually sync), in their industry and on their product cloud, plus clear answers on data handling, adoption guarantees, and who owns the outcome if it goes wrong. In a market built on the fear of a wasted CRM investment, the firm that answers these converts the ones that hide behind certifications.
Yes, and it is one of the highest-leverage shifts we make for CRM consultancies. Project-based implementation revenue is lumpy and the firm scrambles to fill the gaps between deals, while the durable, high-margin revenue sits in managed services, optimization, and AppExchange products that get under-marketed. The two need different motions: implementation buyers are choosing a one-time partner under risk; retainer and product buyers are choosing an ongoing relationship. We separate the funnels, build content and offers for each, and instrument both in your CRM so you can see which mix actually compounds enterprise value — instead of optimizing only for the next big project and starving the recurring revenue.
You will not beat AppExchange, the HubSpot Solutions Directory, or the global SIs head-on for "Salesforce consulting partner," and you should not try. We target the platform-, industry-, migration-, and adoption-specific queries they ignore — "Salesforce vs. HubSpot for [industry]," "how to migrate CRM data without losing pipeline," "why CRM adoption fails" — plus the AI-answer surfaces directories haven't figured out. That is how Synebo reached #1 on Google with no link-building and grew SQLs 500% with 2.73x organic traffic, turning modest authority into compounding, buyer-intent demand that books real implementation conversations rather than attracting admins comparison-shopping a tool they have already bought.
Your buyers now ask ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google's AI overviews to recommend an implementation partner — "best Salesforce partners for fintech," "top HubSpot consultants for RevOps" — before they open the partner directory or visit a single firm's site, and the answer frequently skips both. If your name isn't in that recommendation, you are invisible at the new top of the funnel, no matter your partner tier. We optimize for those buyer prompts and the assets these engines cite, anchored to a defensible positioning the model can substantiate, and we currently get clients recommended in AI search at an 80% success rate — a gap the platform directories and large SIs have not closed.
We treat the platform relationship as a real part of the buying committee, because it is. On most mid-size and enterprise deals the platform's AE or partner manager shapes which SI gets the warm introduction, so your marketing has to make you the obvious, low-risk partner to recommend — clear vertical positioning, visible proof in that domain, and references the AE can stand behind. At the same time we build owned demand so you are not dependent on that introduction. Ignore the platform relationship and you lose the referral that shortlists you; depend on it entirely and you have no pipeline of your own. The system does both, and tracks deals from either source through to closed-won in your CRM.
Appointment funnels and paid can book qualified meetings within weeks; SEO and AI search around platform comparisons, migration, and adoption typically show traction in 4–6 months and compound pipeline impact over 6–12 — and CRM implementation deals, with their procurement and security review, often close later than in lighter B2B tech sales. Either way we report against your CRM — pipeline created, SQLs, and closed-won attributed to channel, including whether a deal came from the platform, the directory, or demand you own — not traffic for its own sake. That discipline is how our portfolio reached $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue, 2.4x organic traffic in 9 months, and 133% SQL growth per quarter.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.