
Intelvision
- $240K revenue from Meta
- 5 deals in 12 months
Took a referral-only firm to a real new-business engine — 5 deals and $240K revenue from Meta in a year, plus 2–4 SQLs/month from ChatGPT.
We already know how enterprise software gets bought: a committee of eight to twenty people you mostly never meet, a procurement and security review that can outlast a quarter, an RFP that wants references and a defensible business case, and an incumbent with switching costs on its side. XQL builds the positioning, account-based demand, AI Search presence, and CRM attribution that get you onto the shortlist and tracked all the way to closed-won — not a lead count that dies in legal review.
An enterprise platform deal is decided by a committee that routinely runs eight to twenty people — an economic buyer, a technical evaluator, end users, IT, security, procurement, legal, and a finance gatekeeper — and you will speak to only a handful of them. The rest form their opinion from your website, an analyst note, a peer in a private Slack, and whatever your champion can carry into rooms you are never in. Marketing that targets a single 'persona' loses, because the person who likes your demo is rarely the person who can say yes.
Closing an enterprise account means surviving a vendor onboarding gauntlet most marketing never accounts for: a security questionnaire and SOC 2 / ISO review, data-residency and DPA negotiation, an MSA redline, and a procurement team whose explicit job is to extract concessions or stall. A deal your AE calls 'committed' can sit frozen for a quarter in InfoSec. If marketing only optimizes the top of the funnel, you generate demand that piles up against a wall you never helped knock down.
Enterprises rarely buy net-new categories — they replace something, and the incumbent has a signed multi-year contract, a sunk-cost integration, and a champion who chose it. 'Doing nothing' is the default and the safest career move for the buyer. So the job is not to prove you are good; it is to make the cost and risk of staying put feel larger than the disruption of switching — a case most enterprise software marketing never bothers to build.
In enterprise software the shortlist is often shaped before a buyer touches your site: a Gartner Magic Quadrant or Forrester Wave position, a Peer Insights or G2 Enterprise-grid rating, and a reference from someone in the same industry at the same scale. A risk-averse buyer derisks the decision by hiring who the analysts and their peers already validated. If you are absent from those surfaces, you are not losing the deal — you are never being considered for it.
At six- and seven-figure ACVs with multi-year commitments, enthusiasm from end users gets a deal nowhere on its own. Someone has to write a business case — quantified ROI, payback period, total cost of ownership against the incumbent, and the risk of not acting — that survives a finance and procurement committee. Most enterprise software marketing sells features and outcomes to the user and leaves the champion to invent the financial argument alone, which is exactly where stalled deals come from.
An enterprise deal can run nine to eighteen months and absorb dozens of touches — anonymous research, an analyst inquiry, a webinar, a champion's internal deck, a procurement call — long before anything looks like a 'lead.' Last-click attribution credits the final demo request and quietly erases the year of marketing that built the shortlist. Without multi-touch, CRM-tracked attribution, marketing in this category looks like a cost center and gets cut precisely when a long-cycle pipeline needs it most.
We have spent 9+ years marketing to technical and executive buyers across 60+ B2B tech companies, and selling into large enterprises has its own physics. The buyer universe is finite and named — you are not fishing a market of thousands, you are winning a specific list of accounts — so spray-and-pray demand gen is structurally wrong here; ABM is. The deal is won or lost in the parts of the funnel marketing usually ignores: the business case, the security questionnaire, the procurement redline, the analyst note. We do not start from a channel. We start with which themes attract a real economic buyer versus a curious practitioner, which proof a risk-averse committee needs to even shortlist you, and how to arm a champion to sell internally on your behalf. Then we wire every activity back to CRM revenue, so the question is never 'did traffic go up' but 'did this become pipeline that survived procurement and closed.'
A default stack, sequenced so demand is concentrated on accounts that can actually buy and the whole committee is reached — not one persona. We adapt it to your category, your incumbents, and your sales cycle, but this is the shape that works when the deal is a six-to-seven-figure, committee-driven, procurement-gated purchase.
Before spend, we fix what you are the obvious replacement for, for whom, and why staying put is the riskier choice. We map the full buying committee — economic buyer, technical evaluator, IT, security, procurement, finance — and write positioning and a displacement narrative each can defend internally. Everything downstream inherits this; without it, more demand just means more committees defaulting to 'do nothing.'
We make the evidence a risk-averse committee demands easy to find and hard to argue with: quantified ROI / TCO models a champion can forward to finance, references at comparable scale and vertical, a real trust and security page, enterprise integration and architecture detail, and analyst-ready material. In this category the business case and proof assets convert better than any campaign, because they remove the reasons procurement and finance say no.
Because the buyer universe is finite and named, we concentrate paid, content, and outreach on the specific accounts that can write the check — and reach the whole committee inside each one, not a single lead. This is the motion that fills qualified pipeline now while the organic engine matures; it is what booked Intelvision a 28.9x ROAS, and it is judged on meetings and pipeline in target accounts, not impressions.
We own the bottom-of-funnel queries where enterprise intent is highest — 'alternatives to [incumbent],' migration, integration with the enterprise stack, security, and TCO terms — backed by content with the depth a technical evaluator respects. This is the compounding base of the system: durable, defensible, and the place most enterprise vendors under-invest, ceding the shortlist to whoever ranks and gets cited instead.
Enterprise buyers and their analysts increasingly ask ChatGPT and Perplexity for 'best [category] platforms' and 'enterprise alternatives to X' before any form loads. AI Search optimization builds the credible third-party mentions, entity clarity, and semantic context LLMs rely on to name you. Across our work this has driven roughly 80% AI Search recommendation success and first inbound leads from LLMs inside 30 days.
We connect every touch to your CRM and track deals through the stages enterprise deals stall in — security review, vendor risk assessment, procurement, legal — so a multi-touch, multi-quarter cycle still reports on one revenue line. Reporting answers 'what closed and what should we double down on,' which is how 2.4x organic traffic in 9 months becomes tracked revenue instead of a nicer chart.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
The same standard applies to every market we work in: we measure marketing by qualified demand, accepted sales conversations, and revenue traced back to marketing inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
You market to a committee and a procurement process, not a persona. We start by positioning you against the incumbent and the cost of doing nothing, then build the business case and proof layer the committee gates on — quantified ROI / TCO models, references at comparable scale, a real security posture, and analyst-ready material. From there we run account-based demand against your named target list, capture displacement and compliance demand with SEO, and get cited in AI Search before the shortlist forms. The non-negotiable is wiring all of it to your CRM and tracking deals through security review and procurement, so you are judged on revenue that survives scrutiny — not on leads that stall in legal.
The buyer universe is finite and named, the committee is large, and the cycle is long and procurement-gated — which changes the whole motion. In SMB you optimize volume and self-serve conversion; in enterprise you concentrate spend on a specific list of accounts and reach eight to twenty stakeholders inside each one, most of whom you never meet. The deal is won in the business case, the security questionnaire, and the procurement redline, not the demo. That is why we lead with account-based demand and a champion-enablement layer rather than a high-volume lead engine that would just pile demand against a wall procurement never lets through.
Yes — and in enterprise software that is substantially a marketing job, because the deal is decided in rooms your AEs are not in. A purchase pulls in IT, security, legal, procurement, and finance, each with veto power, and a vendor risk assessment or MSA redline can freeze a 'committed' deal for a quarter. We arm your champion with the ROI and TCO business case, trust and security assets, and compliance documentation to defend you internally and pre-answer the reviewers, then track deals through those exact stages in your CRM so you can see where they stall and fix it. Across the portfolio this discipline produced $30M+ in CRM-tracked marketing-led revenue and 133% SQL growth per quarter.
By reframing the decision around the cost and risk of staying put, not just your features. Enterprises rarely buy net-new categories — they replace something, and 'do nothing' is the safe default for a risk-averse buyer with a signed multi-year contract. We build a displacement narrative and a quantified case — TCO against the incumbent, the risk and opportunity cost of inaction, a credible migration path, and references from companies that already switched at comparable scale — so your champion can argue that the disruption of switching is smaller than the cost of not. That is the argument most enterprise software marketing never bothers to make, which is why so many promising deals quietly default back to the incumbent.
They often shape the shortlist before a buyer ever reaches your site — a Gartner or Forrester position and a peer reference from someone at the same scale and vertical are how risk-averse committees derisk the decision. We do not replace a formal analyst-relations program, but we make everything around it work harder: a clear, defensible category narrative analysts can repeat, proof assets and references that support your positioning, presence on the peer-review and AI-answer surfaces buyers check, and content that reinforces the same story search engines and LLMs cite. The goal is that when an analyst, a peer, or ChatGPT is asked for the category, your name and your differentiation come up consistently.
A growing share of enterprise buyers and their analysts now ask ChatGPT or Perplexity for the category and a shortlist — 'best [category] platforms,' 'enterprise alternatives to X' — before they ever visit a vendor site. If you are not cited there, you can be eliminated before the evaluation you can see even begins. AI Search optimization builds the credible third-party mentions, clean entity data, and semantic context LLMs rely on to recommend you, and it has to reflect a defensible enterprise positioning rather than claims the model cannot substantiate. We run it as a repeatable program — across our work it drives roughly 80% AI Search recommendation success and first inbound leads from LLMs within 30 days.
It depends on your timeline and how named your target market is — but because the enterprise buyer universe is almost always a finite list of logos, account-based demand is usually the right opening move. ABM and paid concentrate spend on the accounts that can write a seven-figure check and reach the whole committee now — the motion we engineered for Intelvision, turning paid demand into a flagship enterprise deal at a 28.9x return on ad spend ($240K revenue, 257 leads, 100 meetings booked). SEO and AI Search around displacement and compliance themes compound over two to three quarters into a durable, cheaper base, as with Synebo (500% more SQLs, 2.73x organic traffic). The strongest enterprise programs run both, with ABM funding the compounding engine while the business case and proof layer are built before either.
By designing the program around the committee from the start. We map the economic buyer, technical evaluator, IT, security, procurement, and finance, then give each the proof and argument they need — ROI and TCO for finance, integration and architecture depth for the technical evaluator, a trust and security posture for InfoSec, references and outcomes for the economic buyer — and route account-based campaigns to the whole account rather than one inbound lead. The throughline is your champion: we equip the internal advocate to carry your case into the rooms you are not in. Reaching only the person who requests the demo is the most common reason an enterprise deal stalls one veto short.
Account-based and paid campaigns can book qualified meetings in target accounts within the first month or two; SEO and AI Search around displacement and compliance themes typically show meaningful traction in 4–6 months and compound over 6–12 — and enterprise's nine-to-eighteen-month, procurement-gated cycle means deals close later than in most B2B tech. Either way we report against your CRM — pipeline created, SQLs, and closed-won attributed to channel via multi-touch attribution and tracked through procurement — not traffic for its own sake. That discipline is how our portfolio reached $30M+ in CRM-tracked marketing-led revenue, 2.4x organic traffic in 9 months, and 133% SQL growth per quarter.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.