
DBB Software
Built the marketing function from zero — website, SEO, paid, AI search — from 166 to 2,513 monthly clicks and 3 enterprise deals won.
- 28 SQLs from zero
- 3 deals won
Your buyer is running a board-approved, multi-year, business-critical bet — and they are not casually browsing ads for "ERP consulting." They move in anonymous research sessions through the vendor's partner directory, analyst reports, and peer references long before they shortlist anyone, and when they do reach out, they have already half-decided who they trust. The head terms that look like demand are owned by SAP, Oracle, Microsoft, and the partner directories. So paid built on cheap clicks and cost-per-form-fill just buys you curious admins and student traffic the vendor's SERP already attracted, while the CFO, CIO, and VP of Operations who sponsor a real transformation never see you. We run paid social (LinkedIn, Meta) and paid search as one engineered system aimed at the economic buying committee — reaching each role with the proof that answers their specific fear before the RFP is written — with creative that speaks failed-go-live risk and total cost of ownership, and every dollar tracked from ad click to signed SOW in your CRM. Built on paid acquisition for 60+ B2B tech companies, 9+ years, and $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue.
We start with your economics — deal size and ACV, the industry and platform practices you want to grow, the buying-committee structure and the offer that gets a CFO to raise their hand — then audit any existing paid account for the classic ERP-firm leaks: bidding into the vendor-owned category auction, creative built around partner tier and certification counts the buyer cannot differentiate, campaigns optimized to form fills from admins, targeting that only reaches the technical evaluator and never the budget holder, and tracking that cannot separate a paid conversion from a vendor referral. If paid is not the right first lever for your stage — if the proof-and-reference layer isn't ready to convert the click — we say so.
We hold what we find against patterns from 60+ B2B tech companies and 9+ years marketing to executive and technical buyers, including implementation and services partners in enterprise-software ecosystems. That tells us fast whether the constraint is the optimization target (form fills vs. qualified SOW conversations), the targeting layer (technical evaluators vs. the transformation committee), the auction strategy (vendor-owned head terms vs. partner-selection intent), or creative that leads with tier and badges a CFO cannot differentiate — and what a realistic cost-per-accepted-SQL looks like for your deal size, platform focus, and industry, benchmarked against programs that produced tracked revenue.
We commit to the channel mix and offers most likely to produce accepted, in-ICP transformation conversations first — usually LinkedIn precision against the buying committee plus a disciplined paid search account on partner-selection and go-live-risk intent, with Meta retargeting layered on for the long evaluation — and deliberately skip a thin presence everywhere. Often the fastest win is abandoning the vendor-owned head-term auction and the cost-per-form-fill target, and reallocating that budget to reach the CFO and CIO the vendor directory never serves. We always sequence paid against your organic and AI-search foundation: paid buys speed and committee reach; SEO builds the durable demand that compounds underneath it.
We build paid as one engineered system — search and social accounts, buying-committee audiences and negatives, delivery-risk and go-live proof offers, creative that survives a CFO reading it and a procurement committee evaluating it, landing experiences that put industry- and platform-specific proof up front, and CRM-grade conversion tracking that separates paid pipeline from vendor referrals and directory leads across the full board-approved cycle. Then we launch and spend against cost-per-accepted-SQL with a testing plan running underneath.
Each cycle we combine CRM attribution with feedback from your AEs: which campaigns became real transformation conversations with a committee that had budget and board approval, which produced admins with no authority, and which accounts the vendor had already touched. We cut the noise, double down on what produces qualified SOW pipeline, refine the offers and creative, and keep growing the negative lists. The account compounds because it is optimized against signed SOWs across the full committee-driven cycle — not the form fills and cost-per-click the platform rewards by default.
We have run paid for 60+ B2B tech companies, including services and implementation partners inside enterprise-software ecosystems, and spent 9+ years marketing to technical and executive buyers. We know that a "certified gold partner" ad read by a CFO who cannot tell you from the forty other certified firms does nothing but confirm the sea of sameness. We know the head-term auction is unwinnable and the wrong fight. We know that LinkedIn precision targeting of the transformation committee — CFO, CIO, VP of Operations — by industry and company size is usually the only paid lever that reaches the budget holder before the RFP closes the shortlist. For DBB Software we built a paid growth engine from a standing start to 28 SQLs and 3 closed deals in a single year; for Intelvision we engineered paid demand into a flagship enterprise deal at a 28.9x return on ad spend. That discipline sits inside $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue across the portfolio.
Before scaling spend we name the specific reason an ERP firm's paid account underperforms, against this category's failure points: bidding into the head-term auction the vendor owns, creative that leads with partner tier and certification counts the buyer can't differentiate, campaigns optimized to form fills from admins and students rather than transformation conversations, or targeting that only ever reaches IT evaluators and never the CFO and procurement lead who control the budget. Most agencies discover the problem after a quarter of rising cost-per-lead that never converts to a qualified SOW conversation. We name it in the first weeks — and we will tell you if paid is the wrong first lever for your stage rather than bill you to scale a leak. For early-stage ERP firms with thin proof assets, building the case-study and reference layer first is often the higher-return move; paid amplifies proof, it does not substitute for it.
Paid search and paid social do different jobs for an ERP consulting firm. Paid search earns its place only on narrow, high-intent partner-selection queries the vendor under-bids — implementation partner selection ("how to choose a NetSuite implementation partner"), platform comparison for a vertical, go-live risk, and implementation cost — not the vendor-owned category terms. The win is never head-to-head with SAP or the partner directory. LinkedIn is the primary paid lever for most ERP firms and the only dependable way to reach the transformation committee before they search: it targets CFO, CIO, VP of Finance, and VP of Operations by industry, company size, and tech stack — the exact people who sponsor a board-approved implementation but rarely search your category and almost never stumble into your organic content. Meta earns its place for retargeting the long, multi-session evaluation: re-engaging warm accounts that have already touched your site, your case studies, or your LinkedIn content through the 9–18 months before a deal closes. We weight the mix to your ICP, industry focus, and deal size — and say clearly when a channel you're drawn to is wrong for a buying committee buying a multi-year program.
The people who know whether a paid lead was a real transformation conversation are your AEs and partners — not the ad platform, and definitely not your form-fill count. Each cycle we sit with them: which campaigns produced conversations with a committee that had board approval and a live initiative, which produced admins benchmarking without budget authority, which accounts were already in the vendor's pipeline, and what the deals that closed shared — industry, company size, platform, the fear that drove the first call. That feeds directly back into targeting, bids, creative, and the offers we put in front of a CFO versus a technical evaluator. The account sharpens on which clicks became qualified SOW conversations and which became CRM noise the sales team filtered out on the first call.
Every dollar is tracked in your CRM from ad click to booked meeting to accepted SQL to signed SOW — and in a category where a vendor referral and a paid click can touch the same account in the same month, we deliberately separate paid-sourced pipeline from directory and partner-referred pipeline so the two channels are never competing for the same attribution credit. This matters more for ERP firms than most B2B categories, because a deal can begin with a buyer reading a LinkedIn post nine months before a contract, then pass through a vendor referral, a reference check, and a procurement review before close — and paid's influence is easy to erase in that gap, which is exactly when paid budgets get cut. We instrument the full path so you can show cost-per-accepted-SQL and revenue by campaign, channel, and segment in language a founder or board can defend — not a form-fill count that says nothing about whether a SOW was signed.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.