
Synebo
Turned Salesforce-niche SEO into a deal channel — 2.73× traffic and MQL-to-SQL conversion up from 17% to 29%.
- 2.73× organic traffic
- MQL→SQL 17% → 29%
When a buyer is ready to choose a HubSpot partner they search "HubSpot migration agency for SaaS," "RevOps consultancy for B2B," or "HubSpot implementation partner" and compare two or three firms they can barely tell apart on features. They don't browse the directory cold — they shortlist the firms that showed up in their evaluation already. Paid ads — LinkedIn and paid search run as one coordinated system — are how you appear in that evaluation before SEO compounds and when the directory can't be dialed up. We run it for you with 9+ years and 60+ B2B tech companies of memory on what produces a qualified meeting from a firm that sells marketing for a living, measured in CRM-tracked revenue, not impressions.
We start with your economics — retainer price point and ACV, the HubSpot motions you sell (implementation, migration, RevOps, integration), the verticals you serve, which buying-committee titles your AEs close versus which just attend the call, and what a partner-qualified meeting looks like in your CRM — then audit any existing paid account against the category-specific failure modes: broad terms pulling the wrong audience, generic creative a RevOps buyer dismisses, landing pages that address one buyer and ignore the other, and attribution gaps that leave closed retainers untraced back to paid. If paid is not the right first lever for your stage, we say so.
We hold what we find against patterns from 60+ B2B tech companies, including professional-services and consultancy firms in platform ecosystems where the buyer is itself marketing-literate. That tells us fast whether the constraint is the targeting (reaching in-house marketers and competitors instead of buyer-committee titles at the right firm size), the offer (generic "book a call" versus a scoped outcome assessment a buyer with a live decision can act on), or the auction (bidding on broad terms HubSpot owns versus the narrow migration, vertical, and RevOps queries that convert) — and what a realistic cost-per-partner-qualified-meeting looks like, so the plan is benchmarked against paid programs that produced tracked revenue.
We commit to the channel mix and offers most likely to produce accepted, in-ICP partner-qualified meetings — usually LinkedIn precision against the economic buyer plus a disciplined high-intent search account on migration, vertical, and RevOps terms, with Meta retargeting layered on for the long evaluation cycle — and deliberately skip a thin presence everywhere. Often the fastest win is replacing generic creative and a broad auction with a specific offer (a migration brief, an onboarding assessment) and targeting that reaches only the firms with a live HubSpot decision and the titles who sign.
We build paid as one engineered system — search and social accounts, audiences and negatives, outcome-led offers that pass the cobbler's-children credibility test, creative that addresses the RevOps practitioner and the economic buyer without losing either, landing experiences that lead with vertical proof and pipeline outcomes rather than certification badges, and HubSpot-grade conversion tracking that ties ad click to closed retainer. Then we launch and spend against cost-per-partner-qualified-meeting with a structured testing plan running underneath.
Each cycle we combine HubSpot CRM attribution with feedback from your AEs: which campaigns became genuine partner-qualified conversations with firms that had a live HubSpot decision and the right budget, which produced in-house marketers with no mandate to hire a partner, and which account sizes and verticals converted fastest. We cut the noise, double down on what produces real partner-qualified pipeline, refine creative and offers, and grow the negative lists. The account compounds on closed retainers and cost-per-partner-qualified-meeting, not the cost-per-click the platform rewards by default.
We have run paid and demand programs for 60+ B2B tech companies and spent 9+ years marketing to technical and executive buyers — including partners and professional-services firms in platform ecosystems where the buyer is itself marketing-literate and the channel is half-owned by a vendor directory. We know that broad "inbound agency" terms pull students and competitor research, not buyers with a live partner evaluation; that the queries worth winning in search are migration, vertical, and RevOps-specific; that LinkedIn is the workhorse for reaching the economic buyer who signs the retainer but never reads the directory; and that a landing page a RevOps director spots as thin will disqualify you faster than no ad at all. For Split Development we ran paid funnels that booked 66 leads at a $38 CPL with a 34% lead-to-meeting rate and 3 closed deals. Across the portfolio that discipline sits inside $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue.
Before scaling spend we diagnose what is wrong with a HubSpot partner's paid account against the category-specific failure modes: creative that reads as generic to a RevOps-literate audience, bidding on broad terms that pull the wrong audience at the highest CPCs, landing pages that speak to one buyer and ignore the other, or funnels with no attribution wired into HubSpot so you can never show a deal came from paid. We usually find the primary leak in the first weeks — often it is the targeting (reaching in-house marketers and competitors instead of buyer-committee titles at the right firm size) or the offer (a generic "schedule a call" CTA instead of an outcome-shaped assessment or migration brief that gives a buyer with a live decision a reason to engage). We will also tell you if paid is not the right first lever for your stage rather than bill you to scale a system that is working against your credibility.
Paid search and paid social do different jobs for a HubSpot consultancy, and we run them as a coordinated system rather than separate campaigns. Paid search is worth it only on the narrow, high-intent queries a buyer runs when they have already made a platform decision and are now choosing a partner — migration, vertical-specific implementation, RevOps agency, comparison, and onboarding-cost terms — with aggressive negative lists that cut students, in-house marketers, and job seekers. LinkedIn is the workhorse channel for this category: it is often the only reliable way to reach the economic buyer (CEO, COO, CMO, VP of Marketing, VP of Sales) by exact title, company size, and segment — the person who signs the retainer, rarely searches for a HubSpot partner, and can only be reached at scale through role-targeted social. Meta earns its place for retargeting the long, multi-session evaluation at lower cost than staying always-on in search. We weight the mix to your ICP, your HubSpot specialization, and your retainer price point.
We close the loop every cycle with your AEs or founder: which campaigns produced conversations with buyers who had a genuine platform decision — a signed HubSpot deal, a migration on the table, a live RevOps mandate — versus a curious in-house marketer with no budget for a partner engagement. Which leads had decision authority. Which had the right company size and vertical. That feedback feeds straight back into targeting, bids, creative, and negative lists. The account sharpens on partner-qualified meetings, not on the cost-per-click the platform optimizes toward by default — and because your HubSpot CRM is both the reporting system and the proof asset your own prospects evaluate, attribution is built to a standard you would actually show a client.
Every paid dollar is tracked in your HubSpot from ad click to meeting to accepted SQL to closed-won — and we instrument it to the same standard you would build for a client, because a RevOps-literate buyer who audits your own attribution before signing will see exactly how well you practice what you sell. This matters more for a HubSpot consultancy than almost any other category: your deals are committee-driven, the cycle is long, and paid's influence across multiple touches is easy to lose in a spreadsheet, which is exactly when budgets get cut. We report cost-per-partner-qualified-meeting and revenue by campaign and segment, and the discipline stands inside $30M+ in CRM-tracked, marketing-led revenue we have generated for B2B tech and professional-services clients — not a cost-per-click a board member can't connect to a retainer that closed.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.