
Intelvision
Took a referral-only firm to a real new-business engine — 5 deals and $240K revenue from Meta in a year, plus 2–4 SQLs/month from ChatGPT.
- $240K revenue from Meta
- 5 deals in 12 months
Senior marketing leadership for B2B SaaS — owning the one revenue line where PLG and sales-led both report, sequencing the channels that fit your price point and cycle, directing your marketers and agencies, and reporting to founders and investors in CRM-tracked pipeline and net revenue retention. We've run marketing for 60+ B2B tech and SaaS companies, and we make the calls that move ARR — then defend them in the board deck, not in a vanity dashboard.
We start where leadership decisions should: your buyers, your unit economics, your current motion. We audit positioning against the alternatives that crowd your category, separate buyer-intent demand from tire-kicking signups, read won and lost deals and sales-call recordings, look at whether your proof satisfies the technical evaluator and the economic buyer, and map what the CRM can and can't tell you about the path from signup to expansion. We find where revenue actually comes from today — and where it leaks (acquisition, activation, or retention) — versus where effort and spend are going. The output is a clear read on the one or two constraints holding ARR back, not a generic marketing audit.
We hold the diagnosis up against what we've seen across 60+ B2B tech and SaaS companies with comparable price points, motions, and sales cycles. That tells us fast which problems are structural (a category too crowded for feature-list messaging, a PLG funnel measuring the wrong thing) versus solvable this quarter, which channels reliably pay back for a recurring-revenue business, and which 'growth' tactics look attractive but inflate signups without moving ARR. You get leadership informed by precedent, not a CMO running expensive experiments to learn what we already know about how SaaS gets bought.
We make the calls and commit: how you're positioned so you stop competing on feature lists, which motion leads and how PLG and sales-led coexist without cannibalising each other, which channels get funded and in what order against your cycle, and the ARR and pipeline target each decision rolls up to. Crucially we decide what not to do — the channels and 'growth hacks' we defer so a finite marketing budget isn't spread thin chasing signups that never pay. This is the strategy the founders and the board sign off on, and the answer to whether you scale revenue or just scale your top-of-funnel number.
We turn the plan into a running function: positioning and the dual-audience proof layer rebuilt first, the channel roadmap launched in sequence, the growth team and agencies set against the right priorities, and product-signup-CRM data stitched into one revenue line so every channel reports against pipeline and ARR from day one. We direct the execution — managing the in-house marketers, growth team, and agencies — so the engine runs whether or not the founder is in the room, instead of stalling every time they get pulled back into product or fundraising.
Then we run the operating rhythm — weekly reviews, monthly reporting, board-ready quarterly reviews — all read against ARR, pipeline, CAC payback, and NRR, plus live feedback from the AEs and founders who close. We reallocate budget toward the segments and topics the CRM proves convert and expand, cut what only lifts signups, and feed deal-review objections back into positioning and targeting. Because the model is recurring, we don't stop at acquisition — we watch activation and expansion too, so the loop compounds quarter over quarter rather than the function getting judged on a single trial spike.
We've held the marketing-leadership seat across 60+ B2B tech and SaaS companies — platforms, AI tooling, vertical SaaS, Salesforce and ecosystem apps, developer products. So we're not theorising about why your trial-to-paid rate stalls, why a crowded category filters your 'leading platform' messaging out instantly, or why a developer won't open a sales conversation until your docs and security page earn it. We've watched it play out repeatedly and know which leadership moves change it. You get a function steered by pattern — including which 'growth' levers reliably inflate signups without moving ARR — not a CMO learning the SaaS model on your payroll while burn runs.
A first-time-in-category CMO spends a quarter just learning whether your real constraint is acquisition, activation, or expansion — and in SaaS those three demand completely different work. Because we already carry the playbook for recurring-revenue businesses, we name it in weeks: undifferentiated positioning, a PLG funnel optimizing the wrong metric, proof that satisfies the engineer but not the CFO, or attribution that can't connect a self-serve signup to closed-won. That compression is the entire point of fractional — the function starts moving in month one instead of month six, which matters when CAC payback and runway are the numbers the board is watching.
A $12K self-serve product and a $90K sales-assisted platform don't run the same playbook, and most wasted SaaS budget is a sequencing or motion-fit error — paid scaled against a self-serve funnel that can't convert it, content shipped before there's a buyer-intent conversion path. As your fractional CMO we decide which channels to fund and in what order, weighted to your price point, cycle, and where software buyers actually research. Buyer-intent SEO and AI-search citations compound into demand you own; paid and appointment funnels buy pipeline now when a board wants near-term proof. We fund what the CRM proves sources revenue and kill what only lifts a signup chart.
In SaaS the handoffs are where revenue leaks — marketing to product (does the trial activate?), marketing to sales (is the SQL real?), and sales to success (does it expand or churn?). We sit across all of them: shaping what counts as a product-qualified and sales-qualified lead with the people who own the number, sitting in on deal reviews and listening to calls, and feeding objections — 'why you over the incumbent,' 'what's the security posture,' 'what does this cost at scale' — back into positioning, targeting, and the proof layer. The function is steered by what's actually converting and renewing, which is how SQL growth compounds instead of plateauing on a signup high.
A SaaS funnel that spans a self-serve signup, a product-qualified lead, a sales-assisted deal, and a renewal will lose marketing's contribution unless someone instruments it as one revenue line. We run the function against the CRM, stitching product, signup, and pipeline data so PLG and sales-led report on the same number and the board sees ARR influenced — not impressions or trials. Across our engagements this discipline is how we've tracked $30M+ in marketing-led revenue, and in SaaS it's exactly what lets a founder defend marketing spend against a CAC-payback question instead of losing the budget to a board that only sees cost.
Strategy first, channels second, sales feedback always. We measure by the qualified demand and revenue we can trace back inside the CRM.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we've seen a 207% increase in web traffic and an improvement in domain rating from 12 to 45. The team has successfully optimized our SEO strategy and gained around 160 backlinks. Overall, they're responsive and thorough in their project management.
Since working with XQL Group, our domain rating has improved from 27 to 44. In addition, we've seen a 15% increase in monthly traffic within nine months. The team completes work on time and within the agreed budget. Moreover, their subject matter expertise is highly impressive.
XQL Group's efforts have resulted in 44 leads from paid campaigns and improved web traffic from Germany by 5x. The team is responsive, quickly surfaces issues, and communicates regularly through chats and virtual meetings. Their expertise and proactiveness have impressed our team.
Organic traffic has increased by 10–15% each month, and we have started receiving our first inbound requests. XQL Group's optimization tips have also helped improve keyword rankings, and internal stakeholders are impressed with the team's collaborative approach.
XQL Group has successfully defined a clear marketing strategy and established our company's unique value proposition. The team has also helped hire critical specialists for our marketing team. They are communicative and organized, and their expertise in the tech industry is impressive.
Thanks to XQL Group's efforts, we have defined our marketing strategy and hired key developers for our website. The team has launched retargeting campaigns on LinkedIn and developed a strong content marketing strategy. XQL Group's marketing expertise is a hallmark of the engagement.
They were not just talking about AI search in theory; they knew how to approach it practically.
What impressed us most was their deep specialization in working with software development companies.
They've brought structure, strong execution, and constant initiative to improve outcomes.
They operated with the discipline and initiative of an internal senior marketer.
Their ability to combine strategic vision with hands-on execution was particularly valuable.
Their focus on results and true interest in making things work set them apart.
XQL Group's project management was exemplary.
The quality of their work is consistently high.
The model changes the leadership decisions. A SaaS business runs on recurring revenue, so the job isn't just acquisition — it's the whole line from signup to activation to closed-won to expansion, judged on ARR, CAC payback, and net revenue retention. You also have to resolve a conflict a generic CMO won't even see: PLG and sales-led pulling the funnel in opposite directions. We've run this exact motion across dozens of SaaS companies, so we arrive with a point of view on which motion should lead, how PLG and sales-led coexist without cannibalising each other, where your funnel actually leaks, and how to attribute revenue across both — instead of a discovery deck full of questions and a plan built for one-off lead gen.
Yes — that gap is the single most common failure mode in B2B SaaS, and it's rarely a top-of-funnel problem. Trials spike when acquisition is optimized in isolation from activation and the CRM, so you scale users who were never going to pay, while CAC climbs and payback stretches. As your fractional CMO we re-instrument the funnel as one revenue line — signup to PQL to SQL to closed-won to expansion — separate buyer-intent demand from tire-kicking traffic, and shift spend toward the segments and topics that actually convert and retain. The function gets judged on ARR, not a signup count, which is also what stops the board from mistaking trial volume for traction.
Deliberately, because run as one undifferentiated funnel they fight each other — self-serve optimizes for frictionless volume, sales wants qualified accounts, and you end up scaling trials that never convert while starving the pipeline your AEs close. We resolve it at the strategy level: define which motion leads (or how the hybrid works), set explicit product-qualified and sales-qualified lead definitions with sales and product in the room, and instrument both so they report on the same revenue line instead of competing dashboards. Then we sequence channels to feed the right motion — self-serve-friendly intent content and product-led loops on one side, ABM and appointment funnels for sales-assisted deals on the other.
Both — that's the line between us and a product-marketing consultant who hands over a deck and leaves. We make the calls (positioning, motion, channel sequence, budget, the ARR target) and then run them: directing your in-house marketers, growth team, freelancers, and agencies, launching the channel roadmap in order, and reporting results to founders and the board. Where you have a performing SEO or paid partner, we keep and steer them; where one isn't working, we say so with CRM evidence. Many of our SaaS clients keep a growth team and specialist agencies in place — we give them a senior operator to steer so the work finally ladders up to ARR instead of disconnected experiments.
We run the function against the CRM and report in the language the board already uses. We stitch product, signup, and pipeline data into one revenue line, so every channel and quarter is reported as marketing-sourced pipeline, ARR influenced, CAC payback, and contribution to net revenue retention — not impressions, traffic, or trials. That's exactly what lets a founder defend marketing spend against a 'why is payback stretching' question instead of losing the budget to a board that only sees cost. Across our engagements this discipline is how we've tracked $30M+ in CRM-attributed marketing-led revenue and sustained 133% SQL growth per quarter.
By giving each the proof they need without losing the other, because in SaaS they evaluate you completely differently. Developers and platform owners want clear docs, API references, integration depth, and a real security and compliance posture before they'll even open a conversation; the VP or CFO signing the contract wants ROI, payback, and reduced risk. As your fractional CMO we structure positioning and the proof layer so the technical evaluator and the economic buyer can each self-identify and move the deal forward — instead of picking one lane and leaving half the buying committee unconvinced, which is how most SaaS sites quietly leak demand at the moment of trust.
It depends on your price point, cycle, and where the next dollar pays back — that decision is the job — but the default stack for B2B SaaS is buyer-intent SEO and AI-search visibility as the compounding core, appointment funnels and paid for near-term qualified meetings, and founder-led LinkedIn where the founder is still the category's most credible voice. We sequence rather than launch everything at once: paid and funnels buy pipeline now when the board wants proof, SEO and AI search buy durable demand you own. AI-search citations matter more in SaaS every quarter, because buyers ask ChatGPT or Perplexity for a shortlist before they ever load your site — across our work that program drives roughly 80% AI Search recommendation success. We fund what the CRM proves sources revenue and cut the rest.
At that stage the constraint is usually leadership and sequencing, not headcount — and that's exactly what fractional solves. A full-time CMO who genuinely understands a recurring-revenue model, technical and economic buyers, and how to defend a number to a VC board costs $250K+ plus equity and takes six-plus months to find, which is a heavy bet while you're watching burn and payback. A fractional CMO gives you that seniority immediately, gets the function producing tracked ARR, and often defines the exact full-time role you should hire into next once the motion is working — so when you do hire, you hire into a system that already runs, not a blank slate.
We lead them, we don't replace them. We set priorities for your in-house marketers, growth team, freelancers, and agencies, run the cadence, raise the bar on what ships, and coach your people so their capability compounds. Where a channel partner is performing, we keep and steer them; where one isn't, we say so with CRM evidence rather than instinct. The goal is to leave more marketing capability inside your company than when we started — not to create a dependency — so if you later bring on a full-time head of marketing, they inherit a working team and an instrumented system rather than a pile of disconnected experiments.
Yes — it's one of the most common reasons SaaS companies bring us in. When a head of marketing or VP leaves, strategy and momentum usually stall during the search, and in a recurring-revenue business that gap shows up as soft pipeline and slipping NRR a quarter or two later. We step in to hold the seat: keeping strategy on track, directing the team and vendors, maintaining CRM and board reporting, and protecting pipeline and expansion through the gap. We can run the function indefinitely, or bridge it and help you define, hire, and onboard the permanent leader so nothing is lost in the handover.
Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals. We'll show you where the biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.
For B2B tech companies selling complex expertise to serious buyers.

I’m Danylo, founder of XQL. For 9+ years I’ve helped B2B tech companies turn technical expertise into pipeline — 60+ clients and $30M+ in CRM-tracked revenue.
30 minutes, no deck. Bring your offer, channels, and revenue goals — I’ll come with a read on where your biggest growth constraint is and what to build next.